BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Ruby Ranch Internet Cooperative Association,
Petitioner,
DOCKET NO. 01B-493T
v.
Qwest Corporation,
Respondent.
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
The Ruby Ranch Internet Cooperative Association (Coop), pursuant
to Colorado Commission Rule 77(b), as Qwest Corporation (Qwest) to
respond to these requests for admission within ten days.
The following are to be answered with reference with
definitions provided herewith.
- Admit that the Proposed Service poses less risk to Qwests network,
in technical terms, than POTS service.
- Admit that the Proposed Service poses less risk to Qwests network,
in technical terms, than LADS service.
- Admit that the Proposed Service poses less risk to Qwests network,
in technical terms, than alarm line service.
- Admit that Qwests process of activating a Subloop for the Coop does
not require Qwest personnel to do work at the Remote Terminal.
- Admit that Qwests process of activating a Subloop for the Coop does
not require Qwest personnel to do work at any Qwest central office.
- Admit that Qwests process of activating a Subloop for the Coop does
not require Qwest personnel to do work at the Highway 9 Pedestal.
- Admit that Qwests process of activating new POTS service in the
Neighborhood has at times required Qwest personnel to do work at the Remote
Terminal.
- Admit that Qwests process of activating new POTS service in the
Neighborhood has at times required Qwest personnel to do work at the Qwest
central office in Dillon.
- Admit that buried cable between the Crossbox and the Diamond Road Pedestal
provides approximately two hundred copper pairs between those two points.
- Admit that buried cable between the Crossbox and the Diamond Road Pedestal
provides at least one hundred fifty copper pairs between those two points.
- Admit that buried cable between the Diamond Road Pedestal and the Highway
9 Pedestal provides approximately two hundred copper pairs between those two
points.
- Admit that buried cable between the Diamond Road Pedestal and the Highway
9 Pedestal provides at least one hundred fifty copper pairs between those two
points.
- Admit that between the Crossbox and the Diamond Road Pedestal, fewer than
one hundred thirty pairs are in use.
- Admit that between the Diamond Road Pedestal and the Highway 9 Pedestal,
fewer than one hundred thirty pairs are in use.
- Admit that in the buried cable between the Crossbox and the Diamond Road
Pedestal, there are presently at least twenty spare pairs.
- Admit that in the buried cable between the Crossbox and the Diamond Road
Pedestal, there are presently at least fifty spare pairs.
- Admit that in the buried cable between the Diamond Road Pedestal and the
Highway 9 Pedestal, there are presently at least twenty spare pairs.
- Admit that in the buried cable between the Diamond Road Pedestal and the
Highway 9 Pedestal, there are presently at least fifty spare pairs.
- Admit that the buried cables from the Crossbox to homes within the
Neighborhood provide approximately four hundred copper pairs.
- Admit that in the buried cables from the Crossbox to homes within the
Neighborhood, fewer than two hundred pairs are in use.
- Admit that in the buried cables from the Crossbox to homes within the
Neighborhood, there are presently at least two hundred spares.
- Admit that in the buried cables from the Crossbox to homes within the
Neighborhood, there are presently at least one hundred fifty spares.
- Admit that in the buried cables from the Crossbox to homes within the
Neighborhood, there are presently at least fifty spares.
- Admit that the Crossbox has eight positions capable of receiving screw
terminal blocks each with one hundred pairs of screw terminals, six of which
are filled with screw terminal blocks and two of which are presently spare
positions.
- Admit that for carriers providing SDSL over copper pairs rented from
Qwest, Qwest has never made a claim under an Insurance Policy arising out of
the provision of SDSL service.
- Admit that as of October 23, 2001, Qwest had never executed any
nondisclosure agreement with the Coop.
- Admit that as of September 23, 2001, Qwest had never executed any
nondisclosure agreement with the Coop.
- Admit that as of August 23, 2001, Qwest had never executed any
nondisclosure agreement with the Coop.
- Admit that as of July 23, 2001, Qwest had never executed any nondisclosure
agreement with the Coop.
- Admit that as of June 23, 2001, Qwest had never executed any nondisclosure
agreement with the Coop.
- Admit that as of December 6, 2001, Qwest has never provided any documents
to the Coop marked Confidential Information.
- Admit that Qwest has sent billing inserts to Qwest customers in the
Neighborhood, advertising Qwests DSL service.
- Admit that Qwest has never provided DSL service to anyone in the
Neighborhood.
- Admit that Qwest is not presently taking orders for DSL service for anyone
located in the Neighborhood.
- Admit that Qwest has never provided DSL service to anyone located in the
area served by the Dillon Qwest central office.
- Admit that Qwest is not presently taking orders for DSL service for anyone
located in the area served by the Dillon Qwest central office.
- Admit that Qwest has not said in writing that it will provide DSL service
in the Neighborhood.
- Admit that Qwest has not said that it will provide DSL service in the
Neighborhood.
- Admit that Qwest has not said in writing that it will provide DSL service
in the area served by the Dillon Qwest central office.
- Admit that Qwest has not said that it will provide DSL service in the area
served by the Dillon Qwest central office.
- Admit that Qwest has no evidence to establish that AT&T has ever
offered cable modem Internet access in the Neighborhood.
- Admit that Qwest has no evidence to establish that AT&T has said that
it will offer cable modem Internet access in the Neighborhood.
- Admit that as of December 10, 2001, Qwest has never provided cost data to
substantiate its $1707 Quote Preparation Fee.
- Admit that as of December 10, 2001, Qwest has never provided cost data to
substantiate its $126 nonrecurring charge for installation of a Subloop.
- Admit that the Coop asked Qwest for interconnection on or about June 1,
2001.
- Admit that the draft interconnect agreement sent by Qwest to the Coop on
or about June 1, 2001, when printed, exceeds 250 pages in length and exceeds
one hundred thousand words.
- Admit that on or about July 2, 2001, the Coop sent Qwest a proposed
interconnect agreement which, when printed, is fewer than six pages in length.
- Admit that Coop Documents 100-104 are, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of a letter received by Qwest from the
Coop on or about July 2, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Documents 105-110 are, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the
Coop on or about July 29, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Documents 111-115
are, but for matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by
Qwest from the Coop on or about August 2, 2001.
- Admit that Coop
Documents 116-118 are, but for matters of form, substantially a copy of a
letter sent by Qwest to the Coop on or about August 14, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Documents 119-125
are, but for matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by
Qwest from the Coop on or about August 20, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Document 126 is, but for matters
of form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the Coop on or
about August 28, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Documents 127-128 are, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the
Coop on or about August 31, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Document 129 is, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of a letter sent by Qwest to the Coop on
or about October 12, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Documents 130-131 are, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the
Coop on or about October 16, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Document 132 is, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the
Coop on or about November 1, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Document 133 is, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the
Coop on or about November 2, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Document 134 is, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the
Coop on or about November 7, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Document 135 is, but for
matters of form, substantially a copy of an email sent by Qwest to the Coop on
or about November 9, 2001.
- Admit that Coop Document 136 is, but for matters of
form, substantially a copy of an email received by Qwest from the Coop on or
about November 9, 2001.
- Admit that during the July 26, 2001 conference call, Qwest took the
position that the recurring cost for Subloops should be $21.32.
- Admit that during the July 26, 2001 conference call, Qwest took the
position that the non-recurring cost for Subloops should be $126.
- Admit that during the July 26, 2001 conference call, Qwest took the
position that a quote preparation fee of $1707 would have to be paid by the
Coop prior to any field connection point being installed.
- Admit that during the July 26, 2001 conference call, Qwest took the
position that the Coop would be required to have an eleven million dollar
insurance policy.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, the Coop
representatives were placed on hold by Qwest for intervals totaling
more than one hour.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, the Coop
representatives were placed on hold by Qwest for intervals totaling
more than one-half hour.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, Qwest failed to
identify the risks it wanted the Coop to insure against that were different
from those presented by a POTS customer.
- Admit that as of August 3, 2001, Qwest had not identified the risks it
wanted the Coop to insure against that were different from those presented by a
POTS customer.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, Qwest took the
position that the recurring cost for Subloops should be $21.32.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, Qwest failed to
provide support for the $21.32 price.
- Admit that as of August 3, 2001, Qwest had not provided support for the
$21.32 price.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, Qwest took the
position that the non- recurring cost for Subloops should be $126.
- Admit that as of August 3, 2001, Qwest took the position that the
non-recurring cost for Subloops should be $126.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, Qwest took the
position that a quote preparation fee of $1707 would have to be paid by the
Coop prior to any field connection point being installed.
- Admit that during the August 2, 2001 conference call, Qwest failed to
provide support for the $1707 price.
- Admit that as of August 3, 2001, Qwest had not provided support for the
$1707 price.
- Admit that on August 14, 2001, Qwest dropped the $21.32 monthly rate to
$15.12.
- Admit that during the August 15, 2001 conference call, Qwest dropped the
amount of required insurance to one million dollars.
- Admit that during the August 15, 2001 conference call, Qwest maintained
its position as to the $126 and $1707 prices.
- Admit that as of August 16, 2001, Qwest had not explained how it decides
whether to charge a base rate area or zone 1 or
zone 2 or zone 3 rate for Subloops.
- Admit that as of December 1, 2001, Qwest had never provided to the Coop
any nondisclosure agreement with the Coop that had been executed by Qwest.
- Admit that during an August 1, 2001 telephone conference, the Coop asked
Qwest for supporting data for Qwests $126 nonrecurring charge for
Subloops.
- Admit that during an August 1, 2001 telephone conference, the Coop asked
Qwest for supporting data for Qwests $1707 quote preparation fee.
- Admit that during an August 15, 2001 telephone conference, the Coop asked
Qwest for supporting data for Qwests $126 nonrecurring charge for
Subloops.
- Admit that during an August 15, 2001 telephone conference, the Coop asked
Qwest for supporting data for Qwests $1707 quote preparation fee.
- Admit that during an August 27, 2001 telephone conference, the Coop asked
Qwest for supporting data for Qwests $126 nonrecurring charge for
Subloops.
- Admit that during an August 27, 2001 telephone conference, the Coop asked
Qwest for supporting data for Qwests $1707 quote preparation fee.
- Admit that as of November 9, 2001, the Coop asked Qwest for supporting
data for Qwests $126 nonrecurring charge for Subloops.
- Admit that as of November 9, 2001, the Coop asked Qwest for supporting
data for Qwests $1707 quote preparation fee.
- Admit that on August 27, 2001, Qwest proposed to drop its insurance
requirement if the Coop were to pay prices higher than those proposed by Qwest
in its SGAT?
- Admit that between July 26, 2001 and December 10, 2001, Qwests
position regarding an interconnection agreement with the Coop is that the $126
nonrecurring charge for Subloops is non-negotiable.
- Admit that between July 26, 2001 and December 10, 2001, Qwests
position regarding an interconnection agreement with the Coop is that the $1707
quote preparation fee is non-negotiable.
- Admit that between July 26, 2001 and December 10, 2001, Qwests
position regarding an interconnection agreement with the Coop is that the $126
nonrecurring charge for Subloops is available only on a take-it-or-leave-it
basis.
- Admit that between July 26, 2001 and December 10, 2001, Qwests
position regarding an interconnection agreement with the Coop is that the $1707
quote preparation fee is available only on a take-it-or-leave-it basis.
____________________
Carl Oppedahl, Director
Ruby Ranch Internet Cooperative Association